The law is being made right now, in courtrooms that many U.S. practitioners aren’t watching. That’s the gap and closing it starts with knowing where to look.
You’re representing a client in a cryptocurrency dispute. The contract is clear, the harm is real, and the legal theory is sound. But when you go looking for controlling precedent, you find almost nothing. No circuit split to navigate. No landmark ruling to cite. Just a handful of unsettled district court decisions and a body of law that hasn’t caught up to the asset class it’s supposed to govern.
This is the reality facing U.S. crypto litigators right now, and it’s not going to resolve itself quickly.
The Precedent Gap Is Real, and It’s Getting…
